<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monopoly and Competition: Government Intervention and its Effects on the Free Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/</link>
	<description>My Personal Philosopy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:27:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRACE WANJIKU</title>
		<link>http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/comment-page-1/#comment-6083</link>
		<dc:creator>GRACE WANJIKU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damienmanier.com/?p=100#comment-6083</guid>
		<description>WELL DONE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELL DONE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRACE WANJIKU</title>
		<link>http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/comment-page-1/#comment-6082</link>
		<dc:creator>GRACE WANJIKU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damienmanier.com/?p=100#comment-6082</guid>
		<description>CERTIFIED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CERTIFIED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRACE WANJIKU</title>
		<link>http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/comment-page-1/#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>GRACE WANJIKU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damienmanier.com/?p=100#comment-6081</guid>
		<description>NOT CORRECT ANSWER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOT CORRECT ANSWER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Society For Associated Inter-Tertiary Debaters</title>
		<link>http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/comment-page-1/#comment-5023</link>
		<dc:creator>Society For Associated Inter-Tertiary Debaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damienmanier.com/?p=100#comment-5023</guid>
		<description>Somebody essentially assist to make seriously posts I&#039;d state. That is the first time I frequented your web page and so far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this actual post incredible. Great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody essentially assist to make seriously posts I&#8217;d state. That is the first time I frequented your web page and so far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this actual post incredible. Great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rolstead</title>
		<link>http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rolstead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damienmanier.com/?p=100#comment-120</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re bibliography is impresssive.  You may want to add to the theme with Gabriel Kolko&#039;s Triumph of Conservatism.

Another item to add to your list would be a firm trying to maximize total revenue.  I firm like Intel, which seems to have a corner on processor production, is still bound by the intention to maximize revenue.  So if they limit production to raise prices, and earn a higher profit margin, investors will come knocking.  They will want to invest in this firm that is laying golden eggs.  But investors want to be rewarded.  They want as high a return as possible.  Just look at Henry Ford&#039;s partners back when he was starting Ford Motor Company.  So high yields will draw in the investors, and the only way to satisfy them will be to increase production and lower prices as a result, maximizing total revenue, increasing P/E ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re bibliography is impresssive.  You may want to add to the theme with Gabriel Kolko&#8217;s Triumph of Conservatism.</p>
<p>Another item to add to your list would be a firm trying to maximize total revenue.  I firm like Intel, which seems to have a corner on processor production, is still bound by the intention to maximize revenue.  So if they limit production to raise prices, and earn a higher profit margin, investors will come knocking.  They will want to invest in this firm that is laying golden eggs.  But investors want to be rewarded.  They want as high a return as possible.  Just look at Henry Ford&#8217;s partners back when he was starting Ford Motor Company.  So high yields will draw in the investors, and the only way to satisfy them will be to increase production and lower prices as a result, maximizing total revenue, increasing P/E ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://damienmanier.com/2010-03-29/monopoly_and_competition/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damienmanier.com/?p=100#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Before I even read this I am going to say this is really long lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I even read this I am going to say this is really long lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

